"What luck for the rulers that men do not think." -Adolf Hitler
"I will bring this war to an end in 2009. So don’t be confused." -- Senator Barack Obama

"If you don't like Obama, you is a racist!" -- Kelonda

Search This Blog

"If the government robs Peter to pay Paul, he can count on the continued support of Paul.”

Saturday, September 12, 2009

THE CRIME AROUND US: OVERCOMING INTIMIDATION

Helping police led to a bullet hole in one man's home. How is the city encouraging people in high-crime areas to cooperate in investigations?

"But another group of men were doing everything they could to keep him from talking. They tried to stuff him in a car trunk. He was shot. They sprayed his house with bullets in a drive-by. Men smashed up his car with a brick and threatened to 'wet' his mother, slang for shooting her."

Is this not terrorism at your front door?

Go to http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/102106/met_5634994.shtml

The Terrorists Around The Corner

"Federal prosecutors said Tony Maurice Horne Jr. and Troemaine Herbert Storey, both of Glen Burnie, and Jerome Otto Waters Jr. of Annapolis were part of a gang that used violence and intimidation to keep competitors out and silence people who might go to the police.

"The words 'stop snitching' were spray-painted on the street in several Severn neighborhoods, a prosecutor said."

Go to http://www.hometownannapolis.com/cgi-bin/read/2006/12_09-32/TOP

'No Snitch' campaign is no good: It shields criminals from justice

"No snitching is no joke. What 'no snitching' means is that a lot of murderers, rapists and street thugs are able to get away with their crimes....Meanwhile, young people who support the 'No Snitch' campaign are contributing to their own destruction....It is selling out big chunks of the black community."

Go to http://www.suntimes.com/news/mitchell/160134,CST-NWS-mitch05.article

Reportedly a KKK member said, "They are contributing to their own destruction? Then what good are we? At this rate we will have a going-out-of-business sale. Crosses to burn at a very deep discount."

Internalized Racism

"Internalized racism has been the primary means by which we have been forced to perpetuate and 'agree' to our own oppression. It has been a major factor preventing us, as black people, from realizing and putting into action the tremendous intelligence and power which in reality we possess. On a personal level it has been a major ingredient in the distressful and unworkable relationships which we so often have with each other. It has proved to be the fatal stumbling block of every promising and potentially powerful black liberation effort that has failed in the past. Patterns of internalized oppression severely limit the effectiveness of every existing black group."

(In other words, waking up in the morning and saying, "Boy! I wonder how the White man is going to oppress me today!")

"Patterns of internalized racism get played out in dozens of unique ways in each individual. But we have come to recognize that there are certain forms of internalized oppression that are widely experienced by black people in our society. Some forms of these distress patterns are so universal throughout our black sub-culture that they are mistaken for a 'true' part of our culture."

"Internalized oppression leads us to accept a narrow and limiting view of what is 'authentic' black culture and behavior. Blacks have been ridiculed, humiliated, attacked, and isolated because they excelled in school; because they did or did not talk in a particular way; because they liked classical or folk music; because they did not dance; because they did not play basketball; and in many other ways have been told that they were not legitimately 'black enough,' or are 'trying to be white,' etc. All of these hurts were served up and accepted by human beings wearing restimulated patterns of internalized racism."

Go to http://www.rc.org/publications/journals/black_reemergence/br2/br2_5_sl.html

Seeking a victory over intimidators

Although the witness survived and, from his hospital bed, identified Myron Gladney as his attacker, the shooting is one of a string of such incidents plaguing Baltimore's criminal justice system, according to city prosecutors. Intimidation routinely ranges from threatening gestures in the courtroom or attacks that leave witnesses injured or dead, as young men walk the streets wearing 'Stop Snitchin' T-shirts and a video warning witnesses not to snitch proves to be a best-seller."

Go to http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/bal-md.witness05jul05,0,1763714.story?coll=bal-specials-headlines

Black Slaveowners: Free Black Slave Masters in South Carolina, 1790-1860

"A chapter of African-American history that will shock many readers."

No, that is impossible!!!!!!!! Slavery has ALWAYS been white thing.

Go to http://www.sc.edu/uscpress/1995/3037.html

"In the rare instances when the ownership of slaves by free Negroes is acknowledged in the history books, justification centers on the claim that black slave masters were simply individuals who purchased the freedom of a spouse or child from a white slaveholder and had been unable to legally manumit them. Although this did indeed happen at times, it is a misrepresentation of the majority of instances, one which is debunked by records of the period on blacks who owned slaves. These include individuals such as Justus Angel and Mistress L. Horry, of Colleton District, South Carolina, who each owned 84 slaves in 1830. In fact, in 1830 a fourth of the free Negro slave masters in South Carolina owned 10 or more slaves; eight owning 30 or more (2)....The country's leading African American historian, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin, records that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city."

Go to http://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm

No, it is a lie!!!

"The exact breakdown of black slaveowners by category does not yet exist; for some insights into the life of at least one black master, Johnson and Roark's book provides a fairly detailed examination of what are necessarily incomplete records. William Ellison was born a slave in 1790, and developed a skill as a master craftsman, a cotton gin maker. He bought himself out of slavery, apparently with the active encouragement of his master -- who may well have been his father -- and became, in turn, a slaveowner himself -- and wealthier than 90% of white Southerners. Indeed, he owned more slaves 'than all but the richest white planters.'"

Go to http://www.claytoncramer.com/blackmasters.htm

"Four types of profit-seeking black slaveowners emerged in the South. Those who owned large plantations or farms were most likely the offspring of former white masters who left the land to their children through an inheritance. Small farmers used additional slave labor to help with their crops. Free black artisans owned businesses and preferred slaves over wage-earners. The final type of black, profit-seeking slaveowners were those who simply hired out their slaves to other farmers or employers for profit. Black slaveowning for profit began in the 1700s and some even kept their slaves until the Civil War. These owners were, again, those of biracial ancestry who inherited their slaves from their white fathers. The Southern black slaveowners were so passionate about the institution of slavery and their ties to the white race that they decided to fight for the South in the Civil War and defend their right to keep slaves. "

Go to http://www.angelfire.com/ne/bluesurf/words/theunfinishedtale.html

We have to keep this a secret. We have to say this was NEVER a part of Black History. We have to be sure to keep out of Black History studies facts that we don't like.

Let's just pretend it NEVER happened. Blacks NEVER were slave owners.

How else are we going to have honest Black History?

Cut the Crap and Read Your Bible

From March 2007:

Today a friend told me of Black people who claimed that Jesus Christ was persecuted by the Romans because he was Black.

Whoever said, "if you want hide something from Blacks put it in a book" probably was right.

I will agree that Jesus was Black, or at least a person of color. But to say that the Romans persecuted him because he was Black is totally ridiculous.

If these "historians" would just open a Bible and read the four gospels they will see that the Jewish leadership, who were also Black or people of color, were the only ones who were persecuting Jesus out of envy. They were plotting his death.

They were the ones who delivered Jesus into Roman hands. The Romans did not look for Jesus. They did not even pay any attention to him until the Black Jewish leaders asked the Romans to execute him.

Funny. Blacks delivering a Black man to Whites so they can kill him. What a novel concept....