"What luck for the rulers that men do not think." -Adolf Hitler
"I will bring this war to an end in 2009. So don’t be confused." -- Senator Barack Obama

"If you don't like Obama, you is a racist!" -- Kelonda

Search This Blog

"If the government robs Peter to pay Paul, he can count on the continued support of Paul.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Raw Video: Obama Heckled at Health Care Rally

Jay Rockefeller: Internet should have never existed

Peter Schiff: The Recovery That Isn't

"Those who do cling to the absurd belief that, absent exponential productivity gains, the economy can expand while workers are being laid off will undergo a massive test of their convictions now that it's clear the employment picture is bleak. Today's weaker-than-expected report on non-farm payrolls revealed that employers shed 263,000 jobs in September. The losses propelled the headline unemployment rate to a 26-year high of 9.8%. U6, the Bureau of Labor Statistics' most complete measure of unemployment, has risen to a dismal 17%. This figure includes those people who want to work full time, but have simply given up looking, or who have accepted part-time work in the interim. As it is similar to the methodology used during the Great Depression, U6 offers better historical perspective on the severity of our current crisis.

"Taken together with yesterday's larger-than-expected pickup in unemployment claims (first time claims rose by 17,000 to 551,000), today's report makes it certain that the job market is still contracting, even while some indicators like GDP and consumer confidence are moving in the opposite direction."

Martial Law Will Likely Be Declared Soon in America - August 14, 2009

Crazy Obama Supporter Spazzes Out



Isn't this special?

Socialism is the N-word?!?!?!? WTF?!?!?!?

Democrat Congresswoman Blames Racism for the Health Care Debate and Praises Castro

Democrats Accuse Republicans of Racism

Liberal Democrats are racist



Chorus:
90% of all blacks vote Democrat - why? Most of us say we won't vote Republican before that day - we'll die. By telling them we're theirs to keep - not right. We're allowin them to own us cheap - Dem lights. What you say, what you say? Liberal Democrats are racist- what you say, what you say? Liberal Democrats are racist- what you say, what you say? Liberal Democrats are racist- what you say, what you say? Liberal Democrats are racist.

VERSE 1:
With their laws and their lies, the re-enslave us.
Livin in the inner city and ridin the bus is the Liberal Democrat's vision for us, a Liberal party you can't trust
Our Black Founding Fathers played a part too, white's gave them guns to free me and you
We won and took our guns, 200 years pass, they've got gun control again on our ass
With violent criminals and cops who can't defend, gotta protect our people, with gun control, freedom ends.
Oppose school vouchers to strenghten their hold, this left wing agenda leaves us out in the cold

VERSE 2:
Liberal Democrats and teachers bound at the hip, this liberal control of education makes our minds sick
School vouchers will give us a choice and let us decide on how to educate our kids where the opportunity lies
White Democrats oppose school vouchers to ensure their own power, they fear educated blacks who wil be smarter by the hour
Politicians and hypocrites they must be, social elitists we've exposed them, and now we all see
Liveral Democrats step aside and let us be great, let us decide our own fate

VERSE 3:
Liberal Democrat Senator Robert Byrd, former Klansman this has got to be heard
With crocodile tears he says he's sorry, it's just another lie, it's just another story
They want us to believe that Byrd is the first, but we know better, FDR was the worst
He appointed a Klansman to the US Supreme Court Bench, another hooded Democrat- can't stand the stench
Southern Democrats bonded with the Klan cuz for the black man, they had their own plan
The truth that's got me thinkin and it's gottem all freakin, the Republican who freed us was Abraham Lincoln
Liberal Democrats, who need our vote, listen up, we've voiced our opinion but that's not enough
You're in Kosovo and not Rwanda or Sudan, your taxes hold back the successful black man
Stop trapping us in by preventing Urban Sprawl, had enough of your control had enough of you all
More cops and camer's you say are good, but it only takes away more freedom from the hood
You can't re-enslave us, we are too strong, we know what you're doing, and we know that it's wrong
Stop stealing our rights and stop interfering, this is our last warning, don't be hard or hearing

90% of all blacks vote Democrat - why? Most of us say we won't vote Republican before that day - we'll die. By telling them we're theirs to keep - not right. We're allowin them to own us cheap - Dem lights. What you say, what you say? Liberal Democrats are racist- what you say, what you say? Liberal Democrats are racist- what you say, what you say? Liberal Democrats are racist- what you say, what you say? Liberal Democrats are racist.

Racism in the Democratic Party

The Gullyjuice Show Pastor Manning is Right

Blacks Who Hate America

No Chicago Olympics? Bushs Fault

"http://tinyurl.com/ydzs2ld Senator Rowland Burris of Illinois, the Senator who was appointed to fill President Barack Obamas vacant Senate seat, blames George Bush for Chicago not getting the Olympics in 2016. Burris stated in an interview, shortly after the announcement, that the image of the U. S. has been so tarnished in the last 8 years that, even Barack Obama making an unprecedented pitch for the games could not overcome the hatred the world has for us as a result of George Bush.

"Even an Olympic swimmer got in on the blame Bush act.

"I hope youre happy, George W. Bush just look at these sad faces in Chicago as they found out that you cost them the Olympics.

RACISM BEHIND FAILED CHICAGO OLYMPIC BID!



Don't take this seriously.

Obama and Chicago: EPIC FAILURE

Jeremy Wiggins: The Cost of Failure - No Olympics for Chicago

"For Air Force One to fly to Copenhagen, it cost taxpayers: $429,536 EACH WAY.

"For the cargo plane to fly to Copenhagen, it cost us : $64,032 EACH WAY.

"So just for the PLANES to fly to Copenhagen and back : $987,136.

"That's just the planes! That's not including security, hotel, transportation to and from the airport, and food costs. And that's just President Obama! That's not including the cost for Michelle Obama to go there, and it leaves one to wonder if the taxpayers paid for Oprah to travel there as well. I personally don't think the middle of a recession where we have a 9.8% unemployment rate is the time for the President to fly to Copenhagen to shell out a favor for his hometown of Chicago. Do you?"

Henry Lamb: 2 quick ways to lower health-care costs

"Sen. John Rockefeller issued a statement claiming that '… insurance companies are awash in profits.' In reality, the health insurance industry stands 35th among Fortune magazine's profitability rankings, with an average profit of 2.2 percent.

"Sen. Chuck Schumer doesn't think much of profit, either. He has proposed fees (taxes) that will extract $75 billion from private insurance companies over the next decade. Since taxes, or fees, are a cost of doing business that is simply passed along to the consumer, Schumer's idea is nothing more than an indirect tax that individuals will have to pay. But by applying the tax to insurance companies, Obama's promise not to increase taxes for people earning less than $250,000 can go unchallenged.

"It is clear that Rockefeller, Schumer and the majority of Democrats want to reduce the cost of health care by squeezing profit out of the health insurance industry. This, of course, would kill the health insurance industry and leave the task of providing health-care services up to the government. This is the ultimate goal. Whether it's called 'public option,' 'co-op exchange,' or 'single-payer,' the goal is the same: Get rid of the profit private companies earn, and let government provide the service."

Where Are The Liberals Now?

"Why aren’t you protesting the war anymore? American soldiers are still fighting and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan, you know.

"Why don’t you care anymore that the federal government is in bed with Big Business? You howled about Halliburton for 8 long years, yet none of you seem to care about John Murtha’s 'pet projects,' Valerie Jarrett’s real estate holdings, or the federal government’s entanglements with the corrupt 'non-profit' ACORN.

"I contend your accusations of partisanship belong squarely at your own feet. It is you who adamantly refuse to scrutinize and call out your own.

"Think about it…

■If a Republican president had been the first President to need a TelePrompTer to be able to get through a press conference, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama needed it?
■If a Republican president spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take his wife to a play in NYC, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had referred to the “57 states” of America while on the campaign trail, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent “Austrian language,” would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had included tax evaders in his cabinet and circle of advisers, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had been so Spanish-illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had misspelled the word “advice” would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and “potatoe” as proof of what a dunce he is? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president’s administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If, in one year, a Republican president had proposed to double the national debt which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?
■If a Republican president had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved? Did you approve when Obama did it?

"Integrity. Get some."

Andrew Gavin Marshall: The Economic Recovery is an Illusion

"War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength, and Debt is Recovery

"In light of the ever-present and unyieldingly persistent exclamations of ‘an end’ to the recession, a ‘solution’ to the crisis, and a ‘recovery’ of the economy; we must remember that we are being told this by the very same people and institutions which told us, in years past, that there was ‘nothing to worry about,’ that ‘the fundamentals are fine,’ and that there was ‘no danger’ of an economic crisis.

"Why do we continue to believe the same people that have, in both statements and choices, been nothing but wrong? Who should we believe and turn to for more accurate information and analysis? Perhaps a useful source would be those at the epicenter of the crisis, in the heart of the shadowy world of central banking, at the global banking regulator, and the 'most prestigious financial institution in the world,' which accurately predicted the crisis thus far: The Bank for International Settlements (BIS). This would be a good place to start.

"The economic crisis is anything but over, the 'solutions' have been akin to putting a band-aid on an amputated arm. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the central bank to the world’s central banks, has warned and continues to warn against such misplaced hopes."

and read this carefully:

"In May, the information that leaked from the meetings regarded the main topic of conversation being, unsurprisingly, the economic crisis. The big question was to undertake 'Either a prolonged, agonizing depression that dooms the world to decades of stagnation, decline and poverty ... or an intense-but-shorter depression that paves the way for a new sustainable economic world order, with less sovereignty but more efficiency.'

"Important to note, was that one major point on the agenda was to 'continue to deceive millions of savers and investors who believe the hype about the supposed up-turn in the economy. They are about to be set up for massive losses and searing financial pain in the months ahead.'

"Estulin reported on a leaked report he claimed to have received following the meeting, which reported that there were large disagreements among the participants, as 'The hardliners are for dramatic decline and a severe, short-term depression, but there are those who think that things have gone too far and that the fallout from the global economic cataclysm cannot be accurately calculated.' However, the consensus view was that the recession would get worse, and that recovery would be 'relatively slow and protracted,' and to look for these terms in the press over the next weeks and months. Sure enough, these terms have appeared ad infinitum in the global media.

"Estulin further reported, 'that some leading European bankers faced with the specter of their own financial mortality are extremely concerned, calling this high wire act "unsustainable," and saying that US budget and trade deficits could result in the demise of the dollar.' One Bilderberger said that, 'the banks themselves don't know the answer to when (the bottom will be hit).' Everyone appeared to agree, 'that the level of capital needed for the American banks may be considerably higher than the US government suggested through their recent stress tests.' Further, 'someone from the IMF pointed out that its own study on historical recessions suggests that the US is only a third of the way through this current one; therefore economies expecting to recover with resurgence in demand from the US will have a long wait.' One attendee stated that, 'Equity losses in 2008 were worse than those of 1929,' and that, 'The next phase of the economic decline will also be worse than the '30s, mostly because the US economy carries about $20 trillion of excess debt. Until that debt is eliminated, the idea of a healthy boom is a mirage.'"

Scott Atlas: Here’s a Second Opinion

"1. Americans have better survival rates than Europeans for common cancers. Breast cancer mortality is 52 percent higher in Germany than in the United States and 88 percent higher in the United Kingdom. Prostate cancer mortality is 604 percent higher in the United Kingdom and 457 percent higher in Norway. The mortality rate for colorectal cancer among British men and women is about 40 percent higher.

"2. Americans have lower cancer mortality rates than Canadians. Breast cancer mortality in Canada is 9 percent higher than in the United States, prostate cancer is 184 percent higher, and colon cancer among men is about 10 percent higher.

"3. Americans have better access to treatment for chronic diseases than patients in other developed countries. Some 56 percent of Americans who could benefit from statin drugs, which reduce cholesterol and protect against heart disease, are taking them. By comparison, of those patients who could benefit from these drugs, only 36 percent of the Dutch, 29 percent of the Swiss, 26 percent of Germans, 23 percent of Britons, and 17 percent of Italians receive them.

"4. Americans have better access to preventive cancer screening than Canadians. Take the proportion of the appropriate-age population groups who have received recommended tests for breast, cervical, prostate, and colon cancer:

•Nine out of ten middle-aged American women (89 percent) have had a mammogram, compared to fewer than three-fourths of Canadians (72 percent).

•Nearly all American women (96 percent) have had a Pap smear, compared to fewer than 90 percent of Canadians.

•More than half of American men (54 percent) have had a prostatespecific antigen (PSA) test, compared to fewer than one in six Canadians (16 percent).

•Nearly one-third of Americans (30 percent) have had a colonoscopy, compared with fewer than one in twenty Canadians (5 percent).

"5. Lower-income Americans are in better health than comparable Canadians. Twice as many American seniors with below-median incomes self-report 'excellent' health (11.7 percent) compared to Canadian seniors (5.8 percent). Conversely, white, young Canadian adults with below-median incomes are 20 percent more likely than lower-income Americans to describe their health as 'fair or poor.'

"6. Americans spend less time waiting for care than patients in Canada and the United Kingdom. Canadian and British patients wait about twice as long—sometimes more than a year—to see a specialist, have elective surgery such as hip replacements, or get radiation treatment for cancer. All told, 827,429 people are waiting for some type of procedure in Canada. In Britain, nearly 1.8 million people are waiting for a hospital admission or outpatient treatment.

"7. People in countries with more government control of health care are highly dissatisfied and believe reform is needed. More than 70 percent of German, Canadian, Australian, New Zealand, and British adults say their health system needs either 'fundamental change' or 'complete rebuilding.'

"8. Americans are more satisfied with the care they receive than Canadians. When asked about their own health care instead of the 'health care system,' more than half of Americans (51.3 percent) are very satisfied with their health care services, compared with only 41.5 percent of Canadians; a lower proportion of Americans are dissatisfied (6.8 percent) than Canadians (8.5 percent).

"9. Americans have better access to important new technologies such as medical imaging than do patients in Canada or Britain. An overwhelming majority of leading American physicians identify computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the most important medical innovations for improving patient care during the previous decade—even as economists and policy makers unfamiliar with actual medical practice decry these techniques as wasteful. The United States has thirty-four CT scanners per million Americans, compared to twelve in Canada and eight in Britain. The United States has almost twenty-seven MRI machines per million people compared to about six per million in Canada and Britain.

"10. Americans are responsible for the vast majority of all health care innovations. The top five U.S. hospitals conduct more clinical trials than all the hospitals in any other developed country. Since the mid- 1970s, the Nobel Prize in medicine or physiology has gone to U.S. residents more often than recipients from all other countries combined. In only five of the past thirty-four years did a scientist living in the United States not win or share in the prize. Most important recent medical innovations were developed in the United States."

Star Parker: Abortion outrage: AWOL



"But similar publicized abuses at Planned Parenthood – workers agreeing to cover up rape, workers agreeing to earmark funds to abort black babies – all captured on video and audio – produced no similar action in Washington to cut off funds.

"Why?

"Of course, the scope of taxpayer funding to Planned Parenthood is many times greater – a few hundred million dollars per year versus a few million.

"But that's no explanation.

"Congress acts when voters demand it. And, sadly, the decibel level of outrage about abortion, let alone federal funds supporting abortion enablers, is not great enough."

Joe Schimmel: Polanski's pedophile paradise

Just read it.

Michelle Obama and Her Sacrifice

"It must be a true sacrifice to attend the lavish parties, eat the best of foods, drink the best of drinks and sleep in the finest of linens in the best of hotels. Oh how our hearts aches for the sacrifice you are making.

"Well, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, what you are doing is hardly a sacrifice, in fact you insult the intelligence of those who have truly made sacrifices and I would like to share with you what real sacrifice is.
•Real sacrifices are those being made daily by our brave men and women serving in our military all around the world, giving their lives so that we may enjoy our freedom or what is left of it. As well as those who have fought before you were born so that you could enjoy the fact that you are the First Lady.
•Real sacrifice is my father-in-law coming home from WWII with his body full of grenade fragments causing him unbearable pain until his early death at 49.
•Real sacrifice is Martin Luther King giving his life for a dream that one day racism would end yet has been advanced by the fact that your husband, our President, has done little to quench the flames of hate, instead has added fuel to the racist fire.
•Real sacrifice are those people who are working from paycheck to paycheck to make ends meet while you are in Copenhagen for "the children".
•Real sacrifice will be made by the people who will be displaced for the Olympic Village should it go to Chicago. How many of your slum lord friends will enrich themselves by their sacrifice?
•And the ultimate sacrifice was of course made by God who gave His only Son so that we may have life eternal. Yet after sitting in Mr. Wright's church for twenty years he must not have ever preached on that as he was too busy 'damning' America.

"No Michelle, you are very ignorant on what real sacrifice is and what you are doing is hardly a sacrifice."

Victor Davis Hanson: The Obsolescence of a Slur

How do we determine the accuracy of the 'racism' charges?

"1) Is the criticism of Barack Obama unusual by recent presidential standards?

"No. Bush hatred was even more intense. Furthermore, it very soon went from fierce partisanship into a deviant desire for the president’s injury or death. Such derangement was tolerated or indeed enhanced by mainstream liberal establishment figures.

"Alfred A. Knopf published a novel speculating about killing the president. The Toronto Film Festival gave a prize to a docudrama about an envisioned assassination of George W. Bush. His death became the stuff of a New York play, the dream of a Guardian columnist, and a common theme in the left-wing blogosphere.

"A certain amount of this kind of venom was evident in the opposition to Bill Clinton, who was accused of everything from covering up murders to being a serial rapist. By any fair standard, nothing so far in the health-care pushback has approached the smears and dirt directed at Presidents Bush and Clinton.

"2) Is there a systematic racialist attack on other black politicians and leaders?

"No. Gov. David Paterson of New York, for example, alleges a new racism as the chief cause of his own decline. But it is President Obama himself, not white racists, who is pressuring Paterson not to run for reelection.

"Charles Rangel cited racism for much of the public outrage over his behavior. But clearly his problems were caused by his own tax fraud, inability to tell the truth, and violations of ethical standards — which would have destroyed most other politicians long ago. There may well be some racially motivated criticism of prominent at-risk black politicians, but so far there is no evidence that anything other than their own actions accounts for their political troubles.

"3) Is President Obama’s agenda, or Obama himself, the problem?

"Barack Obama could not have been elected without millions of white voters, coupled with a near-monolithic black base. To believe that innate racism has caused many of the millions who voted for him spontaneously to withdraw their support makes no sense.

"Take moderates and independents who were once strong Obama supporters. Why would someone vote for a black man, then eight months later decide that he could not support a black man? Clearly, Obama’s problems derive not from his race, but from his radical agenda for out-of-sight government spending, high taxes, mega-deficits, nationalized health care, cap-and-trade, and an apologetic foreign policy.

"In this regard, imagine two counterfactuals:

"a) Had Obama delayed his liberal initiatives and first devoted his attention to controlling federal spending, winning in Afghanistan, and balancing the budget, would his polls have dropped to near 50 percent? (President Clinton’s own up-and-down experience between 1993 and 1996 is instructive here.)

"b) Should Obama now escalate in Afghanistan, delay his liberal agenda, and balance the federal budget, would not more of his criticism come from the Left — and if so, would it then be considered racist? If a protester at an anti-war march carried a sign that read, 'I love Afghanistan — Bomb Chicago!' would that be racist?

"Indeed, Obama’s adherence to the Patriot Act, renditions, wiretaps, intercepts, tribunals, Predator attacks, and the Petraeus plan in Iraq — and his inability to close Guantanamo on his promised one-year date — have already incurred furor from the hard Left. But again, will that growing anger be termed racially motivated?

"4) Has the Right recently been more racially conscious in its attacks than has the Left?

"Not really. We forget that the left-wing blogosphere savaged Michael Steele in racialist terms when he was running for the Senate from Maryland. Harry Belafonte — to the silence of the Left — called Secretary of State Colin Powell a house slave. No one on the Left objected to the racist cartoons, both here in the United States and abroad in the Arab world, caricaturing Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Much of the liberal hostility against Clarence Thomas suggested in thinly disguised terms that he was an unqualified beneficiary of affirmative action. The assumption is that the heartless Right is guilty of racism unless proven innocent, while the utopian, humanitarian Left could not possibly resort to racist attacks for partisan advantage. So far Barack Obama has seen less virulent opposition than what Alberto Gonzales, Condoleezza Rice, or Michael Steele faced.

"5) Is racial polarization more pronounced among whites or among blacks?

"Here there seems no general trend of racial animosity by any particular group. The occasional over-the-top sign at a tea party, or right-wing minor official who crosses the line, seems balanced by prominent blacks who talk in racially oriented terms. Obama himself has stereotyped whites in Pennsylvania in quasi-racist terms, and has employed banalities like 'typical white person.' The most prominent racist in the United States currently may well be the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the president’s own former pastor, who has insulted in racist fashion whites in general, Jews, Italians, and just about everyone other than African-Americans.

"When Eric Holder called his fellow citizens 'cowards,' his comments were understood to have been directed at white America’s unwillingness to discuss race on his terms. Green-jobs czar Van Jones promiscuously threw around the terms 'whites' and 'white people,' associating them with polluters and high-school mass murderers. Again, there seems no greater white propensity for using stereotypes. Bill Clinton, husband of the current Secretary of State, now points to a white propensity to play a racial card against President Obama; last year, Bill Clinton, husband of Obama rival Hillary Clinton, charged that candidate Obama himself had 'played the race card' on him.

"6) Are there trends in the general society that suggest a new racial polarization?

"Again, not really. Recently a number of high-profile controversies may have had racial overtones, but they did not suggest a pre-existing climate of white racism. Had a white counterpart of Professor Gates insulted a black arresting police officer, made a pejorative reference to 'your mama,' and then counted on his friendship with a white president for support, there might have followed charges of racism. Had a white country-and-western singer grabbed the microphone from a diminutive 18-old-year black gospel singer to announce to a national television audience that another white country-and-western singer was more deserving of the award, there could well have been charges of racism leveled. And had a marquee white tennis player lost her cool, charged a small Asian line judge, and threatened her person, there might well have been charges of racism. In all these and other lurid news stories splashed about on YouTube (cf. the bus attack by several black youths against a white passenger), there has not been much of a larger reaction along racial lines that suggests either that whites or blacks in general are racist, or that either group thinks the other is.

"In short, there is little, if any, evidence that the millions of voters who are losing confidence in the president are doing so for racist reasons. But there is a great deal of evidence that his own extremist positions on spending, government, taxes, foreign policy, and health care, along with a few high-profile, out-of-the-mainstream appointments, have convinced many Americans that Obama, like the Bill Clinton of 1993, is not the moderate voice he appeared to be during the campaign, but a partisan ideologue racing to expand the government before his popular support collapses.

So why is the faux charge of 'racist' so freely bandied about — given that polls suggest it is a losing tactic for liberals?

"The most obvious reason is that a popular president believed he could enact an unpopular agenda on the basis of his own magnetic personality. When he discovered that he could not — and in the process revealed a pattern of partisanship and intolerance — some of his diehard supporters were flabbergasted by the turn of events and resorted in desperation to the 'racist' charge to regain sympathy for both their cause and their president.

"Second, liberals never envisioned that they would so quickly regain the House and Senate, as well as the presidency — partly through tough invective and a demonization of both George W. Bush and a Republican 'culture of corruption.' Their noble ends were felt to justify their often over-the-top rhetoric. Now they most surely do not wish the same level of street invective legitimized and used against themselves. 'Racist!' then serves as a preemptive firewall against possible conflagrations to come.

"Third, there is an almost hysterical fear that 'Racist!' has lost all currency as an effective political tool. Indeed, the charge has been rendered almost meaningless by the frequency of its use and the rarity of its accuracy. Counterintuitively, some believe the more the discredited charge is repeated, the more likely it might be to regain its prior effectiveness."

4: Childhood abuse, to 17 years heroin & crack addict, to parent & school teacher...

3: Childhood abuse, to 17 years heroin & crack addict, to parent & school teacher...

2: Childhood abuse, to 17 years heroin & crack addict, to parent & school teacher...

Childhood abuse, to 17 years heroin & crack addict, to parent & school teacher... Pt. 1

Orphaned, abused, entering crime & chaos, violence, alcoholism and Christ

Straight from 1600 Pennsylania Avenue

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary
___________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release October 2, 2009

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
IN A Q&A SESSION
WITH INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Bella Center
Copenhagen, Denmark

9:51 A.M. CEST

MR. RYAN: The next question relates to -- comes from Mr. Ali, and thank you for the question. How do we intend to deal with all of the millions of people who will enter? And I'd like Lori Healey to answer that question, please.

MS. HEALEY: Thank you. And thank you for the question. We are very fortunate, as evidenced by the presence of the President and the First Lady here today to have a terrifically strong partnership with the federal government in Washington. We've worked very closely with the U.S. State Department. Secretary Clinton has also been a very good partner and has worked to assure everyone the full cooperation of the federal government. Additionally, in June, the White House announced the formation of the Office of Olympic, Paralympic and Youth Sport that will act as the coordinating agency if we are so privileged to be selected for the right to host the Games, to put all the forces of the federal government behind that.

MR. RYAN: If President Obama would like to add to that, please.

THE PRESIDENT: First, emphasize what Lori said in response to Mr. Ali's question. One of the legacies I want to see coming out of Chicago 2016 hosting of the Games is a reminder that America at its best is open to the world. And as has already been indicated, we are putting the full force of the White House and the State Department to make sure that not only is this a successful Games, but that visitors from all around the world feel welcome and will come away with a sense of the incredible diversity of the American people.

And I'm very impressed with part of the presentation that we made matching up host families for the athletes who are going to be there, because, as I said, Chicago, we've got -- we've got everybody. This could be a meeting in Chicago, because we look like the world. And I think that over the last several years sometimes that fundamental truth about the United States has been lost. And one of the legacies, I think, of this Olympics Games in Chicago would be a restoration of that understanding of what the United States is all about, and the United States' recognition of how we are linked to the world.

END
9:53 A.M. CEST

In other words, it's Bush's fault.

Dr. Judith Reisman: DEMAND THE ARREST OF KEVIN JENNINGS

"Many Americans logically anticipate the resignation of President Obama’s 'Safe Schools' Czar Kevin Jennings of the US Department of Education. It was in his pedagogic capacity that Jennings advised a 15-year-old boy who was being sexually violated by an adult male, to submit to two years of abuse, and to thus risk a broad spectrum of venereal diseases including AIDS. Instead of reporting the crime to the police, as the law requires, Jennings advised the boy to use condoms during sodomy (unsafe, illegal). Hence:

• Jennings’ criminal conspiracies DISqualify him as Obama’s 'safe schools' czar.
• Jennings’ criminal conspiracies DO qualify him for immediate arrest and trial.
• To suborn is to 'induce (a person) to commit an unlawful or evil act.' (Moral relativists have no problems with this term -- Robert)
• Jennings suborned ongoing sex crimes against a minor (child sex abuse)
• Jennings was guilty of suborning 'Child Abuse/Neglect and Endangerment.'

"President Obama’s choice is known as the savvy community organizer who created GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network as well as GLSTN, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Teachers' Network.

"Jennings’ criminal collusion in the boy’s years of rape was confirmed in an audiotape released by Fox News. The lad was seduced in a 'bus station bathroom' and violated at a man’s home. Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council reports that in 'One Teacher in 10,' Jennings brags that due to Jennings’ sexual encouragement the boy 'left my office with a smile on his face that I would see every time I saw him on the campus for the next two years, until he graduated.' Of course, Jennings only saw what he desired to see.

"GLSEN is as it says, a 'network,' organized to demonize the normal, natural sexual life. This network would limit employment in schools, libraries, youth groups, research grants, etc., to those who share their homoerotic visions.

"In 1996 one of the 'network,' Gay and Lesbian Adolescent Social Services (GLASS), was exposed as systemically abusing children in their 'five group homes.' The Washington Times reported:

"[S]staff members, members of the GLASS board of directors, and volunteers sexually abused or molested children. A night supervisor was accused of sodomy and threatening children, while a volunteer gave children dildos and made pornographic magazines.

"The headlines in this cryptic story (ignored by The Washington Post), might have noted the fact that the agency confessed to these crimes.

"Nevertheless, typical of what is emerging as a 'politically correct' view of homosexual child abuse, criminal charges were not filed against the confessed child molesters—even considering their abuse of authority. Their license was 'put on probation for five years.' Gosh.

"This 'private, non-profit 501(c)(3) social service agency' caring for 'children and youth who are in foster care, on probation, or who are homeless,' is still open."

Greg Lewis: B-O Fiddles While the World Burns

"Not only are Obama's priorities nonsensical, they are immoral. Indeed, the rationale used to justify them is contradictory to the stated aim of transparency of his presidency. His hand puppet, Robert Gibbs, is increasingly required to mouth logical absurdities in order to explain the administration's actions and policies.
Nicolas Sarkozy, said to be furious that Obama's handlers didn't want to 'ruin' the President's UN debut by confronting Iran about its newly-discovered nuclear plant during his 'nuclear-free world' speech, has reportedly said that Obama is so naive and so egotistical - to the point of being pathologically narcissistic - that the French President fears the American president will be unable to learn the way things work in the real world, as opposed to the 'virtual world' Sarkozy indirectly accused him of living in in his own UN address following Obama's. This from a Frenchman, for God's sake!"

The "Honorable Brother X" says "Bomb racist France too!"

Jay Cost: The Olympics, Obama, and the Permanent Campaign

"What should have been a story about Chicago - or better yet, Rio (good for you, Rio!) - is now a story about...Obama. Of course. Because just about everything in the public sphere must, must become a story about Obama. Because Obama injects himself and his campaign appartus/mindset/worldview into everything. And so, in this case, what would otherwise have been a 'mere' rejection of Chicago and Mayor Daley has now become a rejection of the entire country. Why? Because of his decision to perpetuate the permanent campaign while holding the power of the executive.

"I was hesitant to place a bet on the outcome of the health care debates, but I'll place one here. Sooner or later, the American people are going to say, "Enough is enough" with this constant, incessant politicking that is inevitably built around the specialness of Barack Obama. This is not the way past presidents have behaved, and I believe for good reason: the old way is the way the people like it. If this President continues to inject himself into every little thing - such as he did with this Olympian blunder - at some point he is going to exhaust the country, thereby losing the goodwill of his fellow citizens that he still enjoys today.

"Mr. Obama: please remember that you're just the President. It's a big deal, but it's not that big of a deal. Chester Arthur was President. For goodness sake, Warren Harding was President, and his share of the vote was much larger than yours. Thomas Jefferson's tombstone doesn't even mention his eight years as President. Your current office isn't discussed until Article TWO of the Constitution. Take the hint, and tone it down!"

By the way, I got word that the "Honorable Brother X" says that Obama should order the immediate bombing of Denmark for its "racism" in rejecting Chicago for the 2016 Olympics.

Corruption, Racism, The Olympics, and Obama

Pass This On

Please Pass This On!


Because of recent abductions
In daylight hours, refresh yourself
of these things to do
in an emergency situation...
This is for you,
and for you to share
with your wife,
your children,
everyone you know.
After reading these 9 crucial tips,
forward them to someone you care about.

1. Tip from Tae Kwon Do :
The elbow is the strongest point
on your body.
If you are close enough to use it, do!

2.. Learned this from a tourist guide.
If a robber asks for your wallet and/or purse,
DO NOT HAND IT TO HIM.
Toss it away from you....
Chances are that he is more interested
in your wallet and/or purse than you,
and he will go for the wallet/purse.
RUN LIKE MAD IN THE OTHER DIRECTION!

3. If you are ever thrown into the trunk of a car,
kick out the back tail lights and stick your arm out the hole
and start waving like crazy..
The driver won't see you, but everybody else will.
This has saved lives.

4. Women have a tendency to get into their cars
after shopping, eating, working, etc., and just sit
(doing their cheque book, or making a list, etc.
DON'T DO THIS!)
The predator will be watching you, and this
is the perfect opportunity for him to get in
on the passenger side, put a gun to your head,
and tell you where to go.
AS SOON AS YOU GET INTO YOUR CAR ,
LOCK THE DOORS AND LEAVE...

If someone
is in the car
with a gun
to your head
DO NOT DRIVE OFF,
Repeat:
DO NOT DRIVE OFF!
Instead gun the engine
and speed into anything, wrecking the car.
Your Air Bag will save you.
If the person is in the back seat
they will get the worst of it .
As soon as the car crashes
bail out and run.
It is better
than having them find your body
in a remote location.


5. A few notes about getting
into your car in a parking lot,
or parking garage:

A.) Be aware:
look around you,
look into your car,
at the passenger side floor ,
and in the back seat

B.) If you are parked next to a big van,
enter your car from the passenger door.
Most serial killers attack their victims
by pulling them into their vans while the women
are attempting to get into their cars.

C.) Look at the car
parked on the driver's side of your vehicle,
and the passenger side... If a male is sitting alone
in the seat nearest your car, you may want to walk back
into the mall, or work, and get a
guard/policeman to walk you back out.
IT IS ALWAYS BETTER TO BE SAFE THAN SORRY.
(And better paranoid than dead.)

6. ALWAYS take the elevator
instead of the stairs.
Stairwells are horrible places to be alone
and the perfect crime spot.
This is especially true at NIGHT!)


7. If the predator has a gun
and you are not under his control,
ALWAYS RUN!
The predator will only hit you (a running target)
4 in 100 times; and even then,
it most likely WILL NOT be a vital organ.
RUN, Preferably in a zig -zag pattern!


8. As women, we are always trying
to be sympathetic:
STOP
It may get you raped, or killed.
Ted Bundy, the serial killer, was a good-looking,
well educated man, who ALWAYS played
on the sympathies of unsuspecting women..
He walked with a cane, or a limp, and often
asked 'for help' into his vehicle or with his vehicle,
which is when he abducted
his next victim.

. Another Safety Point:
Someone just told me that her friend heard
a crying baby on her porch the night before last,
and she called the police because it was late
and she thought it was weird.. The police told her
'Whatever you do,

DO NOT open the door..'

The lady then said that it sounded like the baby
had crawled near a window, and she was worried
that it would crawl to the street and get run over.
The policeman said, 'We already have a unit on the way,
whatever you do,

DO NOT open the door.'

He told her that they think a serial killer
has a baby's cry recorded and uses it to coax
women out of their homes thinking that someone
dropped off a baby. He said they have not verified it,
but have had several calls by women saying that
they hear baby's cries outside their doors
when they're home alone at night.


10. Water scam!
If you wake up in the middle
of the night to hear all your taps outside running or what you think is a
burst pipe,

DO NOT GO OUT TO INVESTIGATE!

These people turn on all your
outside taps full ball so that you
will go out to investigate and
then attack.

Stay alert, keep safe, and look out for
your neighbours!
Please pass this on
This e-mail should probably be taken seriously because
the Crying Baby Theory was mentioned on
America 's Most Wanted when they profiled
the serial killer in Louisiana

I'd like you to forward this to all the women you know.
It may save a life. A candle is not dimmed by lighting another candle..

I was going to send this to the ladies only,
but guys, if you love your mothers, wives, sisters, daughters, etc.,

you may want to pass it onto them, as well.

Send this to any woman you know that may need
to be reminded that the world we live in has a lot of crazies in it

and it's better to be safe than sorry..

Everyone should take 5 minutes to read this.
It may save your life or love one's life

Clarice Feldman: ACORN Prosecutions Coast to Coast

"This week, almost a year later, it turns out that the investigative effort of the organization overlooked what ACORN’s critics and Nevada law enforcement authorities did not: the entire ACORN voter operation in that state was designed to defraud Nevada’s voters of their right to an honest election.

"The former Las Vegas director of ACORN, Charles Edwards, pleaded guilty to violations of state law in compensating ACORN workers under a quota system laughably mislabeled 'performance standards.'"

What is done in secret shall be shouted from the housetops....

Ron Radosh: Can We Still Trust Anne Applebaum? Her Irrational Defense of Polanski

"As for the fact that Polanski fled rather than return to court, Applebaum sees 'mitigating circumstances.' After all, the man feared 'irrational punishment.' Irrational punishment? A jail sentence for forced sodomy and rape? How horrible. This from the resident of a government — Poland — which just last week passed a law requiring forced chemical castration of all sex offenders who raped children under the age of 15! And yet that same government — including Applebaum’s husband, the Foreign Minister of Poland — is working on behalf of the campaign to free Polanski.

"So what are the mitigating circumstances? She lists them: His mother died in Auschwitz, his father survived Mauthausen, he was orphaned in the Krakow ghetto and then lived in Communist Poland. All true. Her argument reminds me of those African Americans who applauded the jury nullification in the O.J. Simpson case, arguing that African Americans were oppressed for a century and many were lynched, and this was payback and proof that even if guilty, the accused had a right to go free because of the past history of oppression. Did Applebaum see 'mitigating circumstances' in the O.J. trial outcome?

"Third, she notes Polanski’s age: 76. Evidently the persecutors of the Gulag or the Nazi death camps, if still alive and caught living free for crimes they committed half a century ago, should also go free because of their age. Did she chastise the Israelis for catching Eichmann in Argentina and putting him on trial in Jerusalem? Does she believe that Germany should now release Ivan Demianiuk because the man claims he was wrongly identified, that he was only a guard forced to do what he was asked, and that he is now in his 80’s?

"Finally, Applebaum says nothing about the horrible rape and mental and physical injury sustained by an innocent 13-year-old girl. She has young children who, I believe, are now close in age to the victim decades ago. If her daughter were at a party and a famous film director appeared, drugged her, and raped her in a similar fashion, would Applebaum rush to his defense because he had suffered in the Holocaust and made good films? To ask the question is to answer it.

"Yet, in a more recent blog, the columnist stands firm. She did not know when she wrote it that the Polish government her husband represents would be lobbying for Polanski’s release, and of course, she does not write on behalf of her husband or his government’s position. But she still maintains that the original rape was not 'a straightforward and simple criminal case.' Evidently, she cites the known fact that the girl spoke to her mother on the phone, and her mother approved some of her behavior. This may be called the 'bad mother' defense; she should have told her daughter to leave. Instead, she evidently was glad that the girl had achieved a welcome at the home of such major Hollywood luminaries including Jack Nicholson.

"So, I am more upset that a columnist like Anne Applebaum has somehow lost her senses and her moral compass than that the Hollywood elite — whom we all expect to rally around one of their own — has joined in the ruckus to free Polanski. Does she not realize that these columns hurt her own calls for justice to those who suffered in the Gulag, and her understanding that for certain crimes, there is no statute of limitations? Does she want her readers to take her seriously in the future?

"We have come a long way from both morality and seriousness when an intellectual columnist like Anne Applebaum can write in defense of the indefensible. Now if only Polanski had agreed to colorizing his early black and white films. Then, perhaps, the auteurs would not have sprung so readily to his defense."

VIDEO: Threesomes, Foursomes...or More! Why Multiple Partners Can Be Great

Moral or Moronic?

VIDEO: Dr. AlfonZo Goes Inside Janeane Garofalo's Brain

VIDEO: Protect Yourself From Hollywood PSA

VIDEO: Battle Hymn of The Messiah